News

 

Media Coverage

In Development: Battle Creek enters world spotlight

Feb 7, 2012

In Development: Economic Insights from Battle Creek

By Karl Dehn President & CEO, Battle Creek Unlimited

I want to tell you about a great success story coming out of Battle Creek’s Downtown Transformation Initiative: the Global Food Protection Institute.

The Downtown Transformation Initiative, implemented just three years ago, is an innovation growth strategy being lead by Battle Creek Unlimited and the city of Battle Creek. The Initiative seeks to innovate and foster new economic development opportunities from Battle Creek’s and Michigan’s inherent strengths in food science and food protection.

The first innovation spurred by this Initiative was the Global Food Protection Institute (GFPI). GFPI is a nonprofit organization that was established in Battle Creek in 2009 with initial seed funding from the W.K. Kellogg Foundation. Since its inception, GFPI has had an overall mission to improve public health, both nationally and globally, by improving the safety of our food supply.

GFPI is pursuing this goal through a family of global initiatives:

• “Imagined Food Futures” (IFF), which is a series of conferences and symposia that are facilitating the adoption of policies and practices to improve the safety of our food supply;

• the “International Food Protection Training Institute” (IFPTI), which is building the training infrastructure for the integrated food safety system;

• and the “Emerging Technology Accelerator” (ETA), which is serving as a catalyst in the development of novel food protection technology platforms.

Food protection makes sense in Michigan. Michigan is the second most agriculturally diverse state in the U.S. The state has a rich background in agriculture and boasts more than 1,400 small and large food processors.

In its two short years of existence, GFPI’s success has substantially raised the profile of Southwest Michigan and Battle Creek. Through GFPI’s efforts, Battle Creek is well on its way toward the goal of becoming an international hub for food protection. This goal is being achieved through all three initiatives of the organization.

First, IFF has recently announced its inaugural conference, “Ensuring Safe Food in Dynamic Food Systems,” to be held in Battle Creek on May 1-2, 2012. This first symposium will bring some of the world’s most forward-thinking and experienced leaders to Battle Creek to examine food systems through the lens of food safety.

The major success of IFPTI has also significantly raised the profile of our region. As the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) lead training partner, IFPTI is assisting FDA as it implements the Food Safety Modernization Act. Since the first course was delivered in 2009, IFPTI has trained over 2,000 food protection professionals from all over the U.S. and the world, most of them in Battle Creek.

Four months ago, the FDA announced a five-year, $6.5 million cooperative agreement with IFPTI to expand its curriculum development and training efforts. In November 2011, GFPI President and CEO Dr. Julia Bradsher presented in Beijing at the China International Food Safety and Quality Conference. Recently, IFPTI VP of Curriculum Dr. Craig Kaml and Dr. Bradsher presented to the World Bank in Ankara, Turkey on IFPTI’s training approach.

Finally, consistent with Michigan’s entrepreneurial history and the state’s current support of small business, the Emerging Technology Accelerator (ETA) will provide entrepreneurial support to fast-track the development of emerging technologies that safeguard public health.

GFPI’s VP of External Affairs, Joan Bowman, presented at the Annual Collaboration for Entrepreneurship (ACE12) meeting to raise awareness of food protection technology opportunities for the investment community. ACE12 brings together entrepreneurs, service providers, investors, students, government agents and other members of the business community to network, learn and connect.

ETA has also announced, through a partnership with Great Lakes Entrepreneur Quest (GLEQ), a business plan competition for food safety technologies.

The Global Food Protection Institute has taken a leadership role in protecting our food supply. As our food supply becomes more interconnected, safety has never been more important, and Battle Creek is becoming the recognized leader in this sector — worldwide.

[MiBiz.com]

Entrepreneurs cite 4 emerging opportunities to accelerate Michigan's economic recovery

Jan 31, 2012

Entrepreneurs cite 4 emerging opportunities to accelerate Michigan's economic recovery

By Nathan Bomey

The auto industry is getting most of the credit for Michigan’s gradual economic recovery, but economists generally agree that the auto industry’s resurgence can only stabilize the economy. It won’t lead to a sustainable period of growth.

Ann Arbor-based Estrakon Inc., which makes specialized LED lighting displays like this one, expects to add about 13 jobs in 2012. The Michigan Economic Development Corp. says solid-state lighting is a good opportunity for Michigan.

President Barack Obama, who has made the comeback of the U.S. auto industry a centerpiece in his re-election campaign, acknowledged that the manufacturing sector’s potential is limited.

“Not all the jobs that have gone overseas are going to come back,” Obama told a crowd of 4,000 in Ann Arbor on Friday. “We have to be realistic.”

That’s why Michigan — while celebrating the auto industry’s focus — is aggressively pushing into new industries.

More than 1,000 entrepreneurs, business executives and economic development leaders are gathered today at the Annual Collaboration for Entrepreneurship event at Ann Arbor’s Skyline High School to discuss various issues facing Michigan’s entrepreneurial economy.

Here are four specific industries cited at the conference as strong growth opportunities for the state:

Food safety and protection.

Michigan’s agricultural sector is worth about $71.3 billion, and it’s flourishing. But food safety remains a huge opportunity, said Joan Bowman, vice president of external affairs for Battle Creek-based Global Food Protection Institute.

Bowman said the Global Food Protection Institute is hoping to become a full-service business accelerator that will help Michigan companies develop technologies to prevent disease outbreaks. That includes technologies that can address issues in farm fields, processing and retail sales.

“Food protection makes sense for Michigan,” she said. “We’re looking at technologies that can rapidly identify pathogens and toxins in food and ones that are easily transportable in the field and give a quick result. Specifically we’re looking at technologies that have advanced past the laboratory and university phase and are ready for commercialization.”

In Ann Arbor Township, not-for-profit NSF International, which has more than 400 employees, is already a key player in the food auditing industry.

Electric vehicle charging infrastructure.

Although the battery sector has encountered significant obstacles, the gradual rollout of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles and fully electric cars presents a significant opportunity for charging infrastructure, said Larry Granger, chief information officer of startup Livonia-based PEP Stations LLC.

PEP Stations expects to manufacture between 500 and 1,000 charging stations for use in 2012 in commercial applications and public places. The devices have a magnetic card reader and a touch screen that improve usability, allowing drivers to charge their parked vehicles.

“This is every place you leave home where you stop for 30 minutes,” Granger said. “It’s a virtually unlimited, untapped market at this point."

But Granger also acknowledged significant challenges — namely a lack of startup investment in Michigan.

“It seems like especially in the state of Michigan, it is a bear to get money,” he said.

Mobile software development.

Jimmy Hsiao, CEO of Ann Arbor-based Logic Solutions, which was founded in 1995, said a mobile version is quickly becoming required for websites.

As the Web developed, most desktop-based software applications have integrated a Web component or migrated entirely online. “In the near future, most software will also have a mobile portion,” Hsiao said.

Although mobile application development has become a significant opportunity for Ann Arbor area companies like Logic Solutions and Mobiata, the challenge is the pace of change in the industry — which Hsiao described as “extremely fast.”

“Mobile has a lot of players,” he said. “Because there are a lot of players, there is no on dominant” entity.

Solid-state lighting.

Michigan can already stake a claim as “a leader in solid-state lighting,” said Tim Slusser, technology development manager for cluster development at the Michigan Economic Development Corp.

That sector includes specialized LED makers like Ann Arbor-based Estrakon Inc., which recently won a six-figure early-stage venture capital investment from the Michigan Pre-Seed Capital Fund, which is managed by Ann Arbor SPARK. Estrakon is expected to add about 13 jobs in 2012.

Michigan’s existing solid-state lighting industry is an example of an industry that will benefit from the MEDC’s new focus on “economic gardening,” which emphasizes development of existing companies, instead of attraction of outside companies, Slusser said.

“This is something new for economic development in the state of Michigan,” he said.

[AnnArbor.com]

Faster detection key to improving food safety

Jan 9, 2012

Faster detection key to improving food safety, says GFPI boss

by Elaine Watson

Firms that can improve sample collection and preparation and make pathogen detection faster and cheaper will secure the first cash injections from the Global Food Protection Institute’s (GFPI’s) Emerging Technology Accelerator (ETA) initiative this month.

The ETA initiative is a seed fund that will invest “modest sums” into firms with emerging technologies in food safety, GFPI president Dr Julia Bradsher told FoodNavigator-USA.

“One of the challenges is bringing technology into the field so potential problems can be detected and dealt with more quickly.”

Portable sampling and testing

GFPI staff have evaluated more than 40 potential recipients for ETA cash injections and are particularly interested in firms developing sampling technologies that can test entire batches or shipments (removing the random sampling errors) she said.

They are also interested in firms with portable methods that can be used to prepare samples in the field, without complex or expensive laboratory equipment, technologies that can quickly concentrate target analytes to detect microbes that are present in low cell counts and user-friendly tests that can detect several contaminants at a time.

Platforms of interest include:

• Rapid, sensitive nanoparticle-based assays for food based toxin detection

• Antigen-detecting biosensors for early pathogen detection

• Surface Plasmon resonance spectroscopy

• Antibody-based biosensor kits to detect food pathogens such as mycotoxins

• Molecular sensors to detect trace amounts of molecules in food and water

• Microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) technologies on integrated circuit chips

• Naturally occurring bacteriophages for capture and detection of bacteria and endotoxins

• Microfluid-based diagnostics

Training, novel food safety technologies, symposia

Set up in 2009 with $7m of initial funding from the W.K Kellogg Foundation, Battle Creek, Michigan-based non-profit organization the GFPI now has 15 dedicated staff and has established three initiatives to improve food safety:

• Improving training for food safety professionals via the International Food Protection Training Institute (IFPTI), which partners with Western Michigan University and has been awarded a multi-year grant of $1.3m a year from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

• Advancing novel food protection technologies via the ETA seeding initiative.

• Raising awareness via the Imagined Food Futures symposia, which will deliver four conferences a year, with the first scheduled to run in in May at Battle Creek.

Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA)

The Food Safety Modernization Act, which was signed into law in January 2011, is being implemented progressively, although uncertainty over whether it will be properly funded continues, said Bradsher.

There is also uncertainty over how key aspects of it will be implemented in practice, particularly in relation to vetting overseas suppliers, she added.

“A lot of the rulemaking is still being written, so firms still don’t know what will be required to prove that suppliers are compliant with FSMA requirements.”

A key issue is whether overseas sites that have been audited according to various industry certification schemes will be considered compliant.

She added: _“Will audits compliant with Global Food Safety Initiative rules be sufficient? What we don’t need is people in the US focused on FSMA and people in Europe focused on something else and so on. _

“We don’t want to compete, we need an approach that works globally and that will involve more public private partnerships.”

[FoodNavigator - USA]

Reflections on Food Safety in China

Dec 9, 2011

-

The Sleeping Giant Has Awakened: Reflections on Attending Food Safety Conference in China

by Julia Bradsher

Legend has it that Napoleon Bonaparte once said, when pointing to China on a map, “There, is a sleeping giant. Let him sleep! If he awakes, he will shake the world." I doubt there is a person reading this today that doesn’t know that China has become a significant force in the global food supply.

It is nothing new to say that our food supply has become an increasingly global one. It is estimated that 20% of our food in the United States is imported. This percentage is much higher when you look at certain food products like seafood and fresh produce. China is one of the fastest growing sources of U.S. food imports. It has emerged as the third largest supplier of imported food into the United States after Canada and Mexico.

With the growth of China as an U.S. food source, American public scrutiny and media attention has also increasingly focused on food safety problems in China. Food safety is also a concern among Chinese citizens, as well. This past year alone, there has been plenty: Glow in the dark pork, anti-freeze vinegar, exploding watermelons. While the Chinese government is trying to get a handle on food safety problems in their country, it is creating challenges for them and, oftentimes, embarrassment. It is an understatement to say that China has become a food safety hot zone.

Back to the Future?

About 25 years ago, when I was a graduate student, I spent a summer as an exchange student at what was then the newly established Shantou University in the southern part of the Guangdong Province of China. The China I visited was only 10 years beyond the Mao era. All aspects of life were controlled by the State, and privatization was virtually unheard of. At that time, over sixty percent of the population engaged in agriculture. There were seven telephone lines coming into the city of Shantou at that time, with a population of 750,000. A car was rare with hundreds of bicycles on the streets, tractors unheard of on the farms, and most Chinese had never personally encountered Americans. I remember having a woman walk up to me and touch my curly hair in amazement. Needless to say, the China I experienced in 1986 was like stepping back into a pre-industrial revolution era. We were cautioned to never eat food from vendors on the streets, only drink boiled water or bottled water, and never eat fresh fruits and vegetables unless carefully washed with known “safe water”.

Now, fast-forward to November, 2011. As the president and CEO of the Global Food Protection Institute, I had the opportunity to travel to Beijing to do a presentation on the importance of food safety training at the Fifth Annual China International Food Safety and Quality Conference (CIFSQ). The China of today is the second largest economy in the world. It is the third leading foreign supplier of agricultural and seafood products to the U.S. after Canada and Mexico. Virtually everyone in Beijing has a cellular telephone and wireless internet access is everywhere. Shopping malls are part of the Beijing landscape with food courts that include McDonald’s, Kentucky Fried Chicken, and Pizza Hut. Thousands of privately owned cars on the road have been added to the bicycles, motorcycles, and scooters. Pollution in the air is the norm in Beijing – the entire week I was in Beijing in November, there was thick smog in the air. And yet, we were cautioned by colleagues to never eat food from vendors on the streets, only drink bottled water, and ideally, eat at the hotel, US fast food chains, and restaurants on the main streets.

The Conference

The CIFSQ was held in Beijing on November 2-3, 2011. This was the fifth year for the conference, and it has developed a very strong attendance of over 750 people that cuts across the stakeholders of food safety in China: regulatory officials (Chinese and other countries), food safety and quality personnel from food companies, food science and safety laboratories, training and certification organizations, to name a few.

If I had to pinpoint themes in the conference, I would say there are probably three to four. First, almost every keynote speech and breakout session carried a theme of collaboration and cooperation. In order for China to address its own domestic food safety issues, as well as the concerns of countries who import there food like the United States, collaboration, cooperation, and transparency will be needed. It was very evident by the tone of the speeches by Chinese government officials that they have embraced and made a commitment to improving food safety in the country. The most critical challenge will be to push the food safety and quality policies, practices, and infrastructure down to the level of food production.

The second theme that carried through the conference is the need for uniform standards in food safety. While I am not fluent in Mandarin, I can’t help imagine that all those attending the conference that were not fluent in English must have been daunted by the alphabet soup of food safety systems, standards, audits, certifications, and schemes: FSSC, ISO, HACCP, BRC, GFSI, IFS, and PAS. Mind you, I am not mocking or minimizing the importance and critical value of these. Rather, I am calling out our responsibility when you take into consideration the first theme of collaboration and cooperation. It behooves those of us who are from the countries that are importing China’s food products and those multinational companies that are seeking to participate in the economic opportunities in present in China, to demystify food safety and help get things down to the basics.

The third theme that was apparent throughout the conference was the imperative for all governments in our global economy, regardless of where in the world, to demonstrate to their consuming public, their commitment to improving the safety of the food supply. This theme carried throughout many speakers who represented several countries – Mike Taylor and Dara Corrigan from the US FDA, Li Tairan and Fan Yongxiang from the China Ministry of Health. From the perspective of the United States, the focus was on the Food Safety Modernization Act and the role that new law will play in regulating food exports from China into the United States. In China, there is a renewed commitment from top government officials to improve food safety and hold food producers accountable. One of the speakers at the conference indicated that there are approximately 720,000 inspectors on the ground in China who are charged with inspections to ensure the safety of food produced in China.

Managing Expectations

My overall take-away from my first trip to China in 25 years is that there is great need in China and that there are many organizations, including my own, the Global Food Protection Institute, that can assist China in rising to the occasion. Given that “the sleeping giant” is awake, and he is shaking the world, we can assist them in making up for lost time. In the United States, we’ve had almost 100 years to develop the infrastructure we have to ensure food safety and we’re still not getting it right – case in point the most recent outbreak due to Listeria-contaminated cantaloupes. When FSMA became law, it was the first reform in food safety regulation in almost 75 years. Therefore, we have to set expectations for Chinese food producers if they are going to import food into the United States, and, at the same time, we have to manage our expectations that they are going to be ready and able to change their processes in rapid fashion.

Being Catalyst for Rapid Change

When I returned to the United States and sat down to debrief with the staff here at the Global Food Protection Institute, I asked the question, “How can we be catalyst for rapid change in China?” Our answer was easy – training through our International Food Protection Training Institute.

In China as in other parts of the world, technology has advanced so quickly that it has outpaced more traditional regulatory approaches. Training will be key to ensuring a foundation is built to support food safety in China. Training will also help everyone get on an equal footing and learn new approaches to regulation and inspection. The growing complexity of food production, processing, and distribution challenge the expertise of regulators and inspectors and training will help to address those challenges. Finally, with the increasing demand for safer food and the volume of newly hired inspectors, the underlying base of food safety knowledge and skills is limited. Training will help bring that base of knowledge and skills to a higher level.

Training is a critical element to ensuring that all elements of the food system in China are at a performance level that will ensure the highest level of food safety. That means that regulatory officials, inspectors, food safety and quality personnel from food producers and manufacturers, food scientist, food laboratories, third party auditors, all have adequate training using a standards-based training approach.

[Food Chemical News]

Food Protection Institute Gets FDA Grant

Sep 21, 2011

by Matt Roush

BATTLE CREEK — The International Food Protection Training Institute, a non-profit organization delivering career-spanning, standards-based training to food safety officials, announced it had received a multi-year grant of $1.3 million per year from the United States Food and Drug Administration.

The funding will support joint efforts by FDA and IFPTI to implement the national food-training infrastructure mandated by the Food Safety Modernization Act. This competitive grant is year-one of a five-year cooperative agreement.

Each year, foodborne illness strikes approximately 48 million Americans, hospitalizing 100,000 and killing thousands. The IFPTI and FDA are committed to bringing high quality training to food protection professionals to ensure a competent work force at all levels of government. IFPTI is FDA’s lead training partner in building the integrated food safety system. IFPTI has trained more than 1,800 food safety inspectors from 49 states.

“The International Food Protection Training Institute has made Battle Creek the national leader in food safety,” said U.S. Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich., who chairs the senate’s Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry. “The training being done at IFPTI is preparing thousands of food safety professionals who are on the front lines protecting our food supply and keeping our families safe.”

Added Gerald Wojtala, executive director of IFPTI said, “In this era of thrifty budget management, investing the country’s limited tax dollars in building the training infrastructure for the integrated food safety system is the most cost-effective way to ensure the nation’s food supply is safe.”

And Julia Bradsher, president and CEO of the Global Food Protection Institute, said that “Building an integrated system between federal, state and local agencies responsible for the safety of the nation’s food supply relies heavily on training, and the International Food Protection Training Institute is meeting that need.”

The International Food Protection Training Institute (IFPTI) is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization building and administering the training infrastructure for the nation’s integrated food safety system.

Working with federal regulatory and public health officials, IFPTI is establishing and overseeing the implementation of a career-spanning food protection training curriculum that will increase capacity, and assure competency and equivalency throughout all regulatory jurisdictions in meeting established U.S. federal food safety standards.

IFPTI is an initiative of the Global Food Protection Institute. GFPI is driving the adoption of food protection policies and practices for a safer global food supply.

Financial support for IFPTI is provided by a grant from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and through the generosity of the W.K. Kellogg Foundation.

IFPTI’s training facilities are located in Western Michigan University’s Kendall Center in Battle Creek.

For more information, visit www.ifpti.org.

[CBS Detroit.com]

Global Food Protection Institute in Battle Creek names new CEO

May 6, 2011

By Olivia Pulsinelli

The Global Food Protection Institute in Battle Creek today announced Julia Bradsher as its new president and CEO.

Bradsher succeeds founding president Stephen Benoit, who stepped down in October to to become CEO of Metabolic Solutions Development Co., a Kalamazoo startup developing a drug to treat diabetes. Benoit has remained a member of the GFPI's board of directors. Like Benoit, Bradsher also will serve as president and CEO of the International Food Protection Training Institute, part of the GFPI.

“Julia’s success as a nonprofit executive in the public health policy, regulation and advocacy sectors, as well as her biopharmaceutical industry experience, will be invaluable as she leads GFPI through the next phase of its growth and development,” Benoit said in the GFPI's statement. “I am extremely pleased we were able to attract an executive of her stature to continue the work of the Institute and its family of global initiatives.”

Most recently, Bradsher was CEO of the Food Allergy & Anaphylaxis Network. She also has worked for a company that develops treatment for respiratory diseases, severe allergic reactions and psychiatric disorders, and another that provides analysis and data for the biopharmaceutical industry.

“I’m thrilled to have been selected to lead this groundbreaking organization dedicated to improving public health,” Bradsher said. “GFPI has led the way in building the training infrastructure for the national integrated food safety system through its IFPTI initiative, and I am looking forward to building on this success through the additional growth of its ETA and IFF initiatives."

Battle Creek's growing food protection hub has had many successes in just a few short years.

Covance Inc. last fall held the grand opening for its Nutritional Chemistry and Food Safety Laboratory in downtown Battle Creek. And the IFPTI exceeded its training goals for 2010.

“The biggest accomplishment for the International Food Protection Training Institute is moving from just delivering training to actually now being identified by the FDA as the lead group in building the training infrastructure for the national integrated food-safety systems,” Benoit told Business Review in September.

[Business Review West Michigan]